If you don’t know Peggy Noonan, she was one of the prominent speech writers in the Reagan White House. I love her: her vocabulary, her style and her insight.
The president seemed like a man long celebrated as being very good at politics—the swift rise, the astute reading of a varied electorate—who is finding out day by day that he isn’t actually all that good at it. In this sense he does seem reminiscent of Jimmy Carter, who was brilliant at becoming president but not being president.
Also, something odd. When Mr. Obama stays above the fray, above the nitty-gritty of specifics, when he confines his comments on health care to broad terms, he more and more seems . . . pretty slippery. In the town hall he seemed aware of this, and he tried to be very specific about the need for this aspect of a plan, and the history behind that proposal. And yet he seemed even more slippery. When he took refuge in the small pieces of his argument, he lost the major threads; when he addressed the major threads, he seemed almost to be conceding that the specifics don’t hold.
When you seem slippery both in the abstract and the particular, you are in trouble.
Related Articles
1 user responded in this post
Every word of Peggy Noonan’s article, every one masterfully written. “Can you say narcissist …?”
Consider this from Isaiah 3:4-6
“And I will make boys their princes,
and infants shall rule over them.
And the people will oppress one another,
every one his fellow
and every one his neighbor;
the youth will be insolent to the elder,
and the despised to the honorable.
For a man will take hold of his brother
in the house of his father, saying:
“You have a cloak;
you shall be our leader,
and this heap of ruins
shall be under your rule”;
Do we have a “youth” as a “prince”? Is he ruling over a heap of ruins? Perhaps closer than we realize. More policies like the ones we have seen since January and the consequences will be disastrous.
In a short time I pray that we take his cloak away. And while we’re at it, we should take the cloak from TEC leadership or better yet leave them to their own ruins.
To me, the most important question is “How shall we then live .. ?” after we leave the TEC and even our own diocese behind?