Lots of hand-wringing amongst too many in the larger Episcopal world over the”catholic” nature of church vis-a-vis staying/going. Besides the fact of an exceptionally poor
working definition of “catholic” I think it truly masks a lack of courage to act upon both biblical witness and conviction.
Here’s a nice synopsis from the great Wolfhart Pannenberg on the very issue of “catholicity” and homosexuality. We would do well to read, mark learn and inwardly disgest this prior to our diocesan clergy day this Thursday:
“If a church were to let itself be pushed to the point where it ceased to treat homosexual activity as a departure from the biblical norm, and recognized homosexual unions as a personal partnership of love equivalent to marriage, such a church would stand no longer on biblical ground but against the unequivocal witness of Scripture. A church that took this step would cease to be the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.” (emphasis added)
Wolfhart Pannenberg, “Revelation and Homosexual Experience” Christianity Today (November 11, 1996).
So then, how in the wide, wide world of sports is the departure of a diocese or a local congregation from TEC – while remaining a part of the larger Anglican Communion – in anyway thought of as schismatic (except in the tortured rationalizations of the stay-at-all-costs crowd)?
Related Articles
6 users responded in this post
[...] This post was Twitted by revstevewood [...]
Thanks, Fr. Steve. Brace up the courage of our clergy (I think mine might be with you)!
Steve,
I believe you are right on….and have a correct understanding of catholicity.
God bless,
Creighton +
I am praying for everyone in my home diocese…God not only be with you but guide and grant you His wisdom.
I have officially crossed the Pee Dee and have moved into ACNA, but my prayers will be with you guys Thursday!
With which Anglican Communion might we be practicing “Catholicity”? The Archbishop of Canterbury’s? Or the Global South? I’m afraid it has become schism within schism.
I just finished reading something by J.C. Ryle who quotes the old Latin saying, ‘The schismatic is the one who causes the separation, not the one who separates.’ This is a truth that seems largely lost in the debate.