Related Articles

7 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
User Gravatar
Tami said in October 27th, 2009 at 11:49 am

Asking opinions based on the above:

(1) Would we consider a painting an image? If so, then wouldn’t Michaelangelo’s depictions of God on the Sistene Chapel fall under this category?

(2) Considering Jesus is part of the Trinty / Godhead, do we break this commandment when we have some representation of Jesus (painting, figurine, crucifix, stained glass)?

User Gravatar
Danny said in October 27th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

Tami,
I know folks who have issues with icons and likenesses of Christ. They do think it breaks the 2nd commandment. Now, before invoking the legalism charge I must tell you that they would never call out someone else on it. Just their personal interpretation of scripture.
One guy told me that he didn’t want to see “The Passion of The Christ” because he didn’t want to see in his mind, the image of an actor’s face while he looked in to the wine and bread. He has a very serious take on communion being the representation of Jesus’ body on Earth. And, no he’s not Catholic.

User Gravatar
Tami said in October 27th, 2009 at 3:04 pm

Thanks Danny. It’s a gray area for me, which is why I hope more will weigh in here.

User Gravatar
Katie said in October 27th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

I’ve never had a problem with images of Jesus other than some of them are really unhelpful – like the pale-skinned, brown-haired blue-eyed pictures. Or, the really effeminate looking pictures. But, some of the wonderful paintings, or, some of the modern renditions. What helps me is too have an image of Jesus in a particular setting. One of my favorite images is the icon of the Trinity and the way in which each person of the Godhead is attentive to another person of the Trinity.

User Gravatar
Danny said in October 28th, 2009 at 7:22 am

Katie, (gently)you said you’ve never had a problem with images of Jesus. I think the question is-does God have a problem with images? i.e. the 2nd commandment.

User Gravatar
Julie said in October 28th, 2009 at 11:37 am

Yes, this is an interesting question. I’m wondering if there is a breadth of latitutde regarding this matter. It is clear from the Old Testament and Jewish tradition that no images of Yahweh, any living creature, were tolerated. However, in the Christian Era, from the very earliest days, we have found graffiti and images of Christ and various Christians. I’m wondering if there is a difference between worshiping an image – idolatry – and the usage of images to tell the story – evangelism through artistry? So, just as the preacher communicates the Gospel through words – poetry, hymns, story, statement; so the artist communicates through their medium of paint, drawing, mosaic, stained glass. Just wondering?

User Gravatar
Danny said in October 28th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

Hey,
We are an icon driven culture(see Apple v. Mcsft). No matter how early the church began to use icons is beside the point. People have been sinning for a long time. That said…I continue to break this commandment with all the others. How about keeping the Sabbath???

Leave A Reply

 Username (Required)

 Email Address (Remains Private)

 Website (Optional)