Comments on: Friday Morning Video – KJS @ SAMP

By: StepTom

StepTom — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:16:49 +0000

Perhaps this is why our founders specifically outlawed a state religion or the abridgement of religious freedom by the government. The PB’s statements strongly violate the theoretically defined and hyperbolic “separation of church and state” argument that the left uses to dismiss the views of orthodox believers in the public square. She can’t have it both ways. She either supports the reality and authority of Jesus Christ and defends the faith – as clearly stated in her vows – or she is a secular creature. Current secular sociology and the church should maintain a moral tension that is necessary for a functioning society. By joining the ranks of the secularists, hasn’t she abandoned the maintenance of that tension – and, therefore, her legitimacy as a Bishop in the Body of Christ?. Worse yet, isn’t she buying into the very thing that is completely unraveling our social fabric?

By: Danny

Danny — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:14:38 +0000

I think a lot of the current heretics are letting their politics guide their theology. Theology is secondary…but perhaps a close second. And yes…it happens on the left and right. See Dr. Phil Kidd.

By: StepTom

StepTom — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:32:44 +0000

I was unaware that scripture is to be redefined by trends in Washington. Is it possible that the source of her confusion is that she thought she was running for President instead of PB? She seems, at the very least, to consider her Office to be more of a Cabinet post than as someone sworn to defend the Faith.