The Diocese of Durham website announced earlier this morning that NT Wright, Bishop of the Diocese of Durham is stepping down as Bishop effective 31 August. Dr. Wright, noted New Testament scholar, author and speaker will assume a new appointment at Research Professor of New Testament and Early Chritianity at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Announcing his decison Bishop Wright said:
This has been the hardest decision of my life. It has been an indescribable privilege to be Bishop of the ancient Diocese of Durham, to work with a superb team of colleagues, to take part in the work of God’s kingdom here in the north-east, and to represent the region and its churches in the House of Lords and in General Synod. I have loved the people, the place, the heritage and the work. But my continuing vocation to be a writer, teacher and broadcaster, for the benefit (I hope) of the wider world and church, has been increasingly difficult to combine with the complex demands and duties of a diocesan bishop. I am very sad about this, but the choice has become increasingly clear.
Ruth Gledhill, writing in The Times had this to say:
The leading bishop for the evangelical centre, NT Wright, Bishop of Durham, is returning to academia, taking a chair at St Andrew’s. He is 61 and could in theory have remained at Durham until he was 70. As one of the top five, he carries authority by virtue of his position but also has added value by virtue of his skills of communication and of intellect. He will be badly missed by his troubled church. Professor Ivor Davidson at St Andrews said, ‘Tom Wright ranks among the most distinguished New Testament scholars in the world, and his profile as a churchman, writer and communicator is simply outstanding. I am delighted that he will be joining us at St Andrews, where he will further enhance the long-established reputation of the School of Divinity as a major international centre of biblical and theological scholarship.’ So why is he going?
Interesting as well, though unrelated to this decision, has been the ongoing discussion over Wright’s re-presentation of justification. The February 2010 issue of Tabletalk, published by Ligioner Ministries, was devoted to the current controversy surrounding Dr. Wright’s take on the doctrine of justification. Contributors include D.A. Carson, Michael Horton and Albert Mohler among others. You can click through the articles here.
Related Articles
6 users responded in this post
So, does Wright believe justification and sanctification to be the same thing – and how is this different from the pre-reformation church? Or am I missing the point entirely – which, I’m sad to say, is highly likely….
Sally, it is a complicated issue. Here are two very good articles which summarize nicely the distinctions:
The Justification Debate: A Primer
And,
Not an Academic Question
I don’t mean to stir the pot (or maybe I do), but it just seems to me that N.T. Wright just likes to disagree with things for the sake of disagreeing. I say that without having read the article (which I will do).
I would never suggest that we blindly accept anything. It should always be tested thoroughly. But really, justification? I thought that was pretty straighforward post-Reformation. Luther has got to be steamed.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Steve Wood, dlibbon. dlibbon said: RT @revstevewood: New post: NT Wright Steps Down http://treadinggrain.com/?p=2848 [...]
If you are interested in knowing more about the “New Perspective on Paul” or the “Federal Vision”, Kim Riddlebarger has a series of lectures that deals fairly with NT Wright, Doug Wilson and others.
http://www.christreformed.org/mp3s-and-real-audio-of-academy/
You’ll see quite a bit in there about NT Wright. After listening I don’t think Doug Wilson is as far off on justification as NT Wright. And, no Steve I didn’t listen to them all in one night!
This is an area where I love to get committed Christians into discussion – not so much from the standpoint of what is required for salvation, but whether good works are what shows those who call themselves Christians to actually be just that. I love the discussion NOT because I want to prove a particular point, but to hear so many different viewpoints from those in various parts of their journey with Christ. There is a very fine line between saying that good works are “required” for salvation and saying that good works are the natural outcome of one who truly accepts Christ.