1 user responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
User Gravatar
Tammy Bryant said in March 11th, 2011 at 10:37 am

The Washington Post article wasn’t even the best article that was reporting on the statistics–there were a few other journals/newspapers that did a little better job at trying to grasp the info. My frustration is that everyone is quick to try to find any rationale to this ‘sexless’ phenomenon, yet the vast majority are quick to discount that federally funded abstinence education could have possibly had any impact.

There is some amazing news coming from this study about teenagers being abstinent (not just young adults abstaining at an increased rate), but you can hardly find any media outlet reporting on it.

The recent media reports based on 2010 data from the CDC’s Monitoring the Nation’s Health, reveal a dramatic drop in teens (15-17 years old) ever having sex since federal funding for Title V, Section 510 Abstinence Education programs was allocated in 1996 under Welfare Reform. The data shows that between 1988 and 1995, when Comprehensive Sex Education (condoms and ‘safe sex’ advocacy) was virtually the only message, there was a disappointing 2% increase for girls and only a14% decrease for boys in sexual intercourse.

However, after Abstinence Education received funding in 1996 and programs were implemented according to federal guidelines, sexual activity for 15-17 year old teens began to plummet. By 2006-2008, the impact of Abstinence Education was evidenced by a 27% decrease for girls and a 33% additional decrease for boys reporting they had EVER had sex.

Media reports neglected to announce that, according to this most current CDC data, less than 30% of 15-17 year old teens surveyed have EVER had sexual intercourse. This means that 70% of high school age students have NEVER had sex and are practicing abstinence. That is news that should be shouted from the mountain top and celebrated!

And, whatever federal funding was in place during the time of this amazing success should stay in place so that the trend doesn’t change. Unfortunately, federal funding for abstinence programs have been removed from the federal budget, meaning we could likely trend back towards the rates of unmarried teenage/young adult sex that was occurring in the late 1980s and early 1990s before Abstinence Education had funding.